Sex, The Cornerstone Of Advertising
Posted: Sunday, August 12, 2007
by Judi Lake
Judi Lake Advertising
Let’s face it, sex sells. It always has and it always will.
Flashback to the ‘60s: Remember this famous slogan, "Take it off... take it all off…."
This steamy Noxema TV commercial, where a man shaved his face to strip tease music, was one of the most effective and provocative ad campaigns of the Sixties.
Why? The answer is simple. The ad cleverly played upon our most basic, primitive instinct towards... ‘s-e-x’.
[But what constitutes ‘borderline offensive’?]
‘Borderline offensive’ seems to be the main objective in advertising today. Although using shocking and explicit material to draw attention is nothing new, each added campaign continuously gets more and more risqué.
Many within the industry consider designer Calvin Klein as the pioneer of ‘explicit sexual marketing’. In 1980 Klein featured a then 15 year old Brooke Shields purring ‘Nothing comes between me and my Calvin’s.’ Although this campaign shocked many, it skyrocketed Klein to be the most talked about designer of all time.
In 1995, Klein, who has repeatedly used young children in his provocative campaigns, was the target of a US Justice Department Investigation. The panel asked him if he had thought some of his ads were ‘borderline child pornography’. Unaffected, Klein replied, “These campaign ads are not pornographic. The ads were intended to convey the idea ‘that glamour is an inner quality’ that can be found in regular people in an ordinary setting; it is not something that is exclusive to movie stars and models" (Calvin Klein; A Case Study n.p.).
[Yeah, but isn’t this the same man who blatantly said, “Jeans are about sex?"}
So how does this ‘sexual marketing’ affect our kids?
In many ways.
Exposing children to provocative material too soon is detrimental to them because most youngsters are unable to process the information in its proper context. American culture is permeated with sex and we are forgetting that ‘children need to be children’. We are repeatedly chanting that ‘the children are our future’, but my question is what kind of children and what kind of future?
I am a mother of a soon to be eight year old girl and I can attest to the fact that sex is everywhere for children her age. I am my child’s ‘watchdog’ but, unfortunately, many ‘latch-key’ children do not have that luxury.
A company that primarily targets young children, Abercrombie and Fitch, angered many with the sensual production of their 2002 “Holiday Quarterly". The front cover displayed a naked male and female on a bed, with numerous nude pictures on the first 117 pages. “Abercrombie & Fitch is selling porn, plain and simple," said Don Wildmon, chairman of American Family Association. "This is a company that markets itself to young people, and their message is one of promoting immoral personal and social behavior (AFA Action, n.p.).
'Breaking the mold’ in 2002, this holiday catalog more closely resembled a porn magazine than a kid's clothing catalog. A spokesperson for Abercrombie and Fitch was quoted by saying: “These photos depict young, healthy, presumably red-blooded young Americans posing, frolicking, and generally living what could be considered the ‘good life.’ They do this in Abercrombie clothes, sometimes; other times they do this out of Abercrombie Clothes. It’s the ‘out of that’s drawing the ire out of Uncle Sam"(Collins, n.p.).?
Most currently, Abercrombie and Fitch were bashed for their line of thong underwear targeted for young girls’ ages 7-14. The underwear carry the sayings of “eye candy," “wink-wink," and “kiss me." The underwear is meant to be light hearted and cute….
[‘Light hearted’ and ‘cute’ thongs for my seven year old that has ‘kiss me’ on the behind? I don’t think so… not in this lifetime!]
A television documentary titled “Buying into Sexy: The Sexing up of ‘Tweens", shows the dangerous mutation of teens and preteens interests over the new trends in young fashion. No longer interested in Barbie dolls, the trend is now towards padded bras and thong underwear. “You get more attention," says Amanda, a 12 year old girl. “And strange guys come up to you and try and get you to go to nightclubs." “A lot of guys stare," adds Natasha.
[I guess it is ‘cool’ for a pre-teen to wear hip-hugger jeans so low that you see… well, you know…]
In ‘The Big Ideas of 2006’ issue of the magazine, "Adbusters", a mother’s letter began with “…little girls turned into sexy little women -- freakish, disturbing and sad. I am reminded again why I home-school, why I threw out the TV, why I’d rather stay at home and love my daughter then make a lot of money and watch her childhood and self-esteem drift away on a sea of advertising".
As I write this, I hear my Laura’s laughter coming from the television room but I am safe; her favorite TV show is “I Love Lucy" and all the episodes are on dvd.
Sex may be the cornerstone of advertising for adults, but it is damaging our kids in more ways than one. If we really are so concerned about our kids, ‘our future’, maybe we ought to begin to protect them.
Don’t be silent; let your voice be heard. If you see a commercial that is offensive, write to the network, your local TV station and the maker of the product. Visit www.now.org/media to find addresses for local TV stations.
This Article has been viewed 1,796 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
Top-level comments on this article: (3 total)Thank you, Judy. You sound like me - I have actually gotten criticized by some family members for being so "strict" because I monitored my kids television time and programs they watched. Old movies and musicals were the mainstay of their viewing for years. After seeing the Abercrombie and Fitch catalogs you mention, we discussed them as a family and all decided not to buy their clothing. The ban is still in place. Great article! (Nice to know I am not alone.)Mary, that is too funny, because I've surrounded my Laura with the old black and whites before she could even walk! Ironically, she wasn't too into Shirley Temple, but loves the old "The Miracle Worker" where Patty Duke played Helen Keller and Judy Garland and Mickey Rooney -- Topper, I Love Lucy and on and on... So I am 'safe' as I said in the article and actually aren't our kids worth it? Thanks for your kind comments!
Yes, Judi, the cornerstone of everything these days is SEX, how to, where to and everything else associated with it. It reinforces the Easter Bunny theory I have been promoting. If it looks good on the outside it must be good. Not always true. Once again good work. PS Thats why I took my picture off the site, too sexy. Ok stop laughing, I thought you would enjoy a little humor. Best wishes!Hi Robert, am busy with deadlines with work but I just happened on this site this evening and now you've answered my question; I was wondering why you took your photo off you page and now I know why (smile) -- Yes, it really does reinforce your 'Easter Bunny' theory. Thanks for your comments and wishing you a great weekend! btw: when will you put your picture back up?
Well put Judi. Thanks for speaking up.
We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.